Skoda Rapid 2017 vs BMW 1 series 2019
Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 1.6 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 116 HP | 150 HP | |
Torque: | 250 NM | 350 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.9 seconds | 8.4 seconds | |
BMW 1 series is a more dynamic driving. Skoda Rapid engine produces 34 HP less power than BMW 1 series, whereas torque is 100 NM less than BMW 1 series. Due to the lower power, Skoda Rapid reaches 100 km/h speed 1.5 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.1 | 4.4 | |
Real fuel consumption: | 5.1 l/100km | 5.7 l/100km | |
The Skoda Rapid is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Skoda Rapid consumes 0.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the BMW 1 series, which means that by driving the Skoda Rapid over 15,000 km in a year you can save 45 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Skoda Rapid consumes 0.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the BMW 1 series. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 42 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 1340 km in combined cycle | 950 km in combined cycle | |
1410 km on highway | 1100 km on highway | ||
1070 km with real consumption | 730 km with real consumption | ||
Skoda Rapid gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
BMW 1 sērija 2019 2.0 engine: A fairly reliable engine with a long service life. On the whole, the chains are more reliable than in the BMW N-series engines, but they also have a tendency to stretch under heavy use. The engine needs to be ... More about BMW 1 sērija 2019 2.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.30 m | 4.32 m | |
Width: | 1.71 m | 1.80 m | |
Height: | 1.46 m | 1.43 m | |
Skoda Rapid is smaller, but slightly higher. Skoda Rapid is 2 cm shorter than the BMW 1 series, 9 cm narrower, while the height of Skoda Rapid is 3 cm higher. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 415 litres | 380 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1200 litres | |
Skoda Rapid has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Skoda Rapid has 35 litres more trunk space than the BMW 1 series. The BMW 1 series may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
Turning diameter: | no data | 11.4 meters | |
Gross weight (kg): | 1`750 | 1`980 | |
Safety: | no data | ||
Quality: | average | above average | |
Average price (€): | 7800 | 20 000 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Skoda Rapid has
|
BMW 1 sērija has
| |