Skoda Rapid 2017 vs Skoda Fabia 2015
| Body: | Hatchback | Estate car / wagon | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
| Engine: | 1.4 Petrol | 1.2 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 125 HP | 110 HP | |
| Torque: | 200 NM | 160 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.9 seconds | 9.6 seconds | |
|
Skoda Rapid is more dynamic to drive. Skoda Rapid engine produces 15 HP more power than Skoda Fabia, whereas torque is 40 NM more than Skoda Fabia. Thanks to more power Skoda Rapid reaches 100 km/h speed 0.7 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.8 | 4.8 | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 45 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1140 km in combined cycle | 930 km in combined cycle | |
| 1340 km on highway | 1090 km on highway | ||
| 850 km with real consumption | 720 km with real consumption | ||
| Skoda Rapid gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
| Skoda Rapid 2017 1.4 engine: The engine is reliable, however, owners frequently report excessive oil consumption, which is usually linked to piston ring issues. Loss of power is another common complaint. It's advised against maintaining ... More about Skoda Rapid 2017 1.4 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.30 m | 4.26 m | |
| Width: | 1.71 m | 1.73 m | |
| Height: | 1.46 m | 1.47 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Skoda Rapid is 5 cm longer than the Skoda Fabia, 3 cm narrower the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 415 litres | 530 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1490 litres | 1395 litres | |
| Despite its longer length, This could mean that the Skoda Rapid uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Skoda Rapid (by 95 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.9 meters | 10.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Skoda Rapid is 0.5 metres more than that of the Skoda Fabia, which means Skoda Rapid can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | 1`691 kg | 1`633 kg | |
| Net weight: | 1`236 kg | 1`178 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 455 kg | 455 kg | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | average | average | |
| Skoda Fabia has slightly fewer faults. Deffect rate in annual technical inspection is similar for both cars, it's slightly higher for Skoda Rapid, so Skoda Fabia quality could be a bit better. | |||
| Average price (€): | 7200 | 5800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Skoda Rapid has
|
Skoda Fabia has
| |