Skoda Rapid 2017 vs Audi A3 2016

 
Skoda Rapid
2017 -
Audi A3
2016 - 2020
Gearbox: AutomaticAutomatic
Engine: 1.4 Petrol1.4 Petrol
Camshaft drive: Timing beltTiming belt

Performance

Power: 125 HP150 HP
Torque: 200 NM250 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 8.9 seconds8.2 seconds
Audi A3 is a more dynamic driving.
Skoda Rapid engine produces 25 HP less power than Audi A3, whereas torque is 50 NM less than Audi A3. Due to the lower power, Skoda Rapid reaches 100 km/h speed 0.7 seconds later.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 4.85.1
Real fuel consumption: 6.4 l/100km6.9 l/100km
The Skoda Rapid is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
By specification Skoda Rapid consumes 0.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Audi A3, which means that by driving the Skoda Rapid over 15,000 km in a year you can save 45 litres of fuel.
By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Skoda Rapid consumes 0.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Audi A3.
Fuel tank capacity: 55 litres50 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 1140 km in combined cycle980 km in combined cycle
1340 km on highway1110 km on highway
850 km with real consumption720 km with real consumption
Skoda Rapid gets more mileage on one fuel tank.

Engines

Average engine lifespan: 380'000 km360'000 km
Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used.
Engine production duration: 11 years10 years
Engine spread: Installed on at least 7 other car models, including Volkswagen Passat, Volkswagen Golf, Skoda Superb, Seat Leon, Audi A1Installed on at least 6 other car models, including Volkswagen Passat, Skoda Superb, Seat Leon, Audi Q3
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Skoda Rapid might be a better choice in this respect.

Dimensions

Length: 4.30 m4.31 m
Width: 1.71 m1.79 m
Height: 1.46 m1.43 m
Skoda Rapid is smaller, but slightly higher.
Skoda Rapid and Audi A3 are practically the same length.
Trunk capacity: 415 litres380 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
no data1220 litres
Skoda Rapid has more luggage capacity.
Skoda Rapid has 35 litres more trunk space than the Audi A3.
Turning diameter: no data10.9 meters
Gross weight (kg): 1`6911`800
Safety: no datano data
Quality:
average

above average
Audi A3 has fewer problems.
According to annual technical inspection data Skoda Rapid has serious deffects in 35 percent more cases than Audi A3, so Audi A3 quality is probably significantly better
Average price (€): 780017 000
Pros and Cons: Skoda Rapid has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • longer expected engine lifespan
  • roomier boot
  • lower price
Audi A3 has
  • more power
  • more dynamic
  • fewer faults
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv