Skoda Rapid 2017 vs Renault Clio 2012
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.0 Petrol | 0.9 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 110 HP | 90 HP | |
| Torque: | 200 NM | 135 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.8 seconds | 11.8 seconds | |
|
Skoda Rapid is more dynamic to drive. Skoda Rapid engine produces 20 HP more power than Renault Clio, whereas torque is 65 NM more than Renault Clio. Thanks to more power Skoda Rapid reaches 100 km/h speed 2 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.6 | 4.3 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 5.9 l/100km | 6.3 l/100km | |
|
The Skoda Rapid is a better choice in terms of fuel economy based on user-reported consumption, although the specification shows otherwise. By specification Skoda Rapid consumes 0.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Renault Clio, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Skoda Rapid could require 45 litres more fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Skoda Rapid consumes 0.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Renault Clio. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 40 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1190 km in combined cycle | 930 km in combined cycle | |
| 1370 km on highway | 1080 km on highway | ||
| 930 km with real consumption | 630 km with real consumption | ||
| Skoda Rapid gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.30 m | 4.06 m | |
| Width: | 1.71 m | 1.73 m | |
| Height: | 1.46 m | 1.45 m | |
| Skoda Rapid is 24 cm longer than the Renault Clio, 3 cm narrower, while the height of Skoda Rapid is 1 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 415 litres | 300 litres | |
|
Skoda Rapid has more luggage capacity. Skoda Rapid has 115 litres more trunk space than the Renault Clio. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.9 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Skoda Rapid is 0.3 metres more than that of the Renault Clio. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`645 | 1`588 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | average | below average | |
| Skoda Rapid has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Renault Clio has serious deffects in 15 percent more cases than Skoda Rapid, so Skoda Rapid quality is probably better | |||
| Average price (€): | 8000 | 9400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Skoda Rapid has
|
| |