Skoda Rapid 2017 vs Dacia Logan 2005
| Body: | Hatchback | Sedan | |
|---|---|---|---|
| The hatchback generally has more luggage space thanks to a larger trunk door opening and the ability to convert the rear of the passenger compartment into luggage space. Sedans tend to be quieter than hatchbacks, due to a more isolated rear area. | |||
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
| Engine: | 1.0 Petrol | 1.4 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 110 HP | 75 HP | |
| Torque: | 200 NM | 112 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.8 seconds | 13 seconds | |
|
Skoda Rapid is more dynamic to drive. Skoda Rapid engine produces 35 HP more power than Dacia Logan, whereas torque is 88 NM more than Dacia Logan. Thanks to more power Skoda Rapid reaches 100 km/h speed 3.2 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.6 | 6.8 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 5.9 l/100km | 7.1 l/100km | |
|
The Skoda Rapid is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Skoda Rapid consumes 2.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Dacia Logan, which means that by driving the Skoda Rapid over 15,000 km in a year you can save 330 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Skoda Rapid consumes 1.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Dacia Logan. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 50 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1190 km in combined cycle | 730 km in combined cycle | |
| 1370 km on highway | 900 km on highway | ||
| 930 km with real consumption | 700 km with real consumption | ||
| Skoda Rapid gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.30 m | 4.25 m | |
| Width: | 1.71 m | 1.74 m | |
| Height: | 1.46 m | 1.53 m | |
| Skoda Rapid is 5 cm longer than the Dacia Logan, 3 cm narrower, while the height of Skoda Rapid is 7 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 415 litres | 510 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 510 litres | |
|
Dacia Logan has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Skoda Rapid has 95 litres less trunk space than the Dacia Logan. This could mean that the Skoda Rapid uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.9 meters | 10 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Skoda Rapid is 0.9 metres more than that of the Dacia Logan, which means Skoda Rapid can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`645 | 1`535 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | below average | low | |
| Skoda Rapid has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Dacia Logan has serious deffects in 605 percent more cases than Skoda Rapid, so Skoda Rapid quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 8000 | 1200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Skoda Rapid has
|
Dacia Logan has
| |