Skoda Rapid 2017 vs Citroen C4 2015
| Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.0 Petrol | 1.2 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 110 HP | 131 HP | |
| Torque: | 200 NM | 230 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.8 seconds | 12.2 seconds | |
| Skoda Rapid engine produces 21 HP less power than Citroen C4, whereas torque is 30 NM less than Citroen C4. Despite less power, Skoda Rapid reaches 100 km/h speed 2.4 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.6 | 4.9 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 5.9 l/100km | 6.9 l/100km | |
|
The Skoda Rapid is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Skoda Rapid consumes 0.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Citroen C4, which means that by driving the Skoda Rapid over 15,000 km in a year you can save 45 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Skoda Rapid consumes 1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Citroen C4. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1190 km in combined cycle | 1220 km in combined cycle | |
| 1370 km on highway | 1420 km on highway | ||
| 930 km with real consumption | 860 km with real consumption | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
| Citroen C4 2015 1.2 engine: Since the timing belt is immersed in oil, it doesn't last the intended 180,000 kilometers, and its wear products clog the oilways. First years of engines have been recalled due to excessive axial play in the ... More about Citroen C4 2015 1.2 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.30 m | 4.33 m | |
| Width: | 1.71 m | 1.79 m | |
| Height: | 1.46 m | 1.49 m | |
|
Skoda Rapid is smaller. Skoda Rapid is 3 cm shorter than the Citroen C4, 8 cm narrower, while the height of Skoda Rapid is 3 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 415 litres | 408 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1183 litres | |
| Even though the car is shorter, Skoda Rapid has 7 litres more trunk space than the Citroen C4. The Citroen C4 may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.9 meters | 10.7 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Skoda Rapid is 0.2 metres more than that of the Citroen C4. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`645 | 1`810 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | below average | below average | |
| Skoda Rapid has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Citroen C4 has serious deffects in 105 percent more cases than Skoda Rapid, so Skoda Rapid quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 7200 | 6800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Skoda Rapid has
|
Citroen C4 has
| |