Skoda Rapid 2017 vs BMW 1 series 2015
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.0 Petrol | 1.6 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 95 HP | 177 HP | |
| Torque: | 160 NM | 250 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11 seconds | 7.4 seconds | |
|
BMW 1 series is a more dynamic driving. Skoda Rapid engine produces 82 HP less power than BMW 1 series, whereas torque is 90 NM less than BMW 1 series. Due to the lower power, Skoda Rapid reaches 100 km/h speed 3.6 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.5 | no data | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 52 litres | |
| 960 km with real consumption | 680 km with real consumption | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | |
| Front-wheel drive cars (Skoda Rapid) have better traction on slippery roads and when climbing hills, better fuel economy, and are less expensive to purchase. On the disadvantage side, FWD cars usually have less towing capacity, poorer acceleration and harder handling. Rear-wheel drive cars (BMW 1 series) have better handling on dry roads, better acceleration, more even weight distribution and more fun to drive. RWD is also better for towing large loads. The cons of rear-wheel drive are less interior and trunk space and more difficulty maneuvering in wet and snowy conditions. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.30 m | 4.33 m | |
| Width: | 1.71 m | 1.77 m | |
| Height: | 1.46 m | 1.44 m | |
|
Skoda Rapid is smaller, but slightly higher. Skoda Rapid is 3 cm shorter than the BMW 1 series, 6 cm narrower, while the height of Skoda Rapid is 2 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 415 litres | 360 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1490 litres | no data | |
|
Skoda Rapid has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, The BMW 1 series may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.9 meters | 10.9 meters | |
| Gross weight: | 1`625 kg | 1`870 kg | |
| Net weight: | 1`170 kg | 1`305 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 455 kg | 565 kg | |
| Skoda Rapid load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 24 procentiem less than BMW 1 series. Therefore, BMW 1 series is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | average | average | |
| Skoda Rapid has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data BMW 1 series has serious deffects in 65 percent more cases than Skoda Rapid, so Skoda Rapid quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 7200 | 10 000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Skoda Rapid has
|
BMW 1 sērija has
| |