Skoda Rapid 2017 vs BMW 1 series 2019
| Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.0 Petrol | 1.5 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 95 HP | 140 HP | |
| Torque: | 160 NM | 220 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11 seconds | 8.5 seconds | |
|
BMW 1 series is a more dynamic driving. Skoda Rapid engine produces 45 HP less power than BMW 1 series, whereas torque is 60 NM less than BMW 1 series. Due to the lower power, Skoda Rapid reaches 100 km/h speed 2.5 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.5 | 5.7 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 5.7 l/100km | 6.9 l/100km | |
|
The Skoda Rapid is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Skoda Rapid consumes 1.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the BMW 1 series, which means that by driving the Skoda Rapid over 15,000 km in a year you can save 180 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Skoda Rapid consumes 1.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the BMW 1 series. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 42 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1220 km in combined cycle | 730 km in combined cycle | |
| 1370 km on highway | 970 km on highway | ||
| 960 km with real consumption | 600 km with real consumption | ||
| Skoda Rapid gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
| BMW 1 sērija 2019 1.5 engine: The B38 1.5-liter three-cylinder petrol engine, introduced in 2013, was designed with a focus on fuel efficiency and low emissions to meet modern environmental standards. While it received generally positive ... More about BMW 1 sērija 2019 1.5 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.30 m | 4.32 m | |
| Width: | 1.71 m | 1.80 m | |
| Height: | 1.46 m | 1.43 m | |
|
Skoda Rapid is smaller, but slightly higher. Skoda Rapid is 2 cm shorter than the BMW 1 series, 9 cm narrower, while the height of Skoda Rapid is 3 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 415 litres | 380 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1490 litres | 1200 litres | |
|
Skoda Rapid has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, The BMW 1 series may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Skoda Rapid (by 290 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.9 meters | 11.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Skoda Rapid is 0.5 metres less than that of the BMW 1 series, which means Skoda Rapid can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | 1`625 kg | 1`870 kg | |
| Net weight: | 1`170 kg | 1`320 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 455 kg | 550 kg | |
| Skoda Rapid load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 21 procentiem less than BMW 1 series. Therefore, BMW 1 series is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | average | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 7200 | 19 000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Skoda Rapid has
|
BMW 1 sērija has
| |