Skoda Rapid 2017 vs Kia Ceed 2015
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.0 Petrol | 1.6 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 95 HP | 130 HP | |
| Torque: | 160 NM | 160 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11 seconds | 10.5 seconds | |
|
Kia Ceed is a more dynamic driving. Skoda Rapid engine produces 35 HP less power than Kia Ceed, the torque is the same for both cars. Due to the lower power, Skoda Rapid reaches 100 km/h speed 0.5 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.5 | 6.4 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 5.7 l/100km | 6.6 l/100km | |
|
The Skoda Rapid is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Skoda Rapid consumes 1.9 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Kia Ceed, which means that by driving the Skoda Rapid over 15,000 km in a year you can save 285 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Skoda Rapid consumes 0.9 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Kia Ceed. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 53 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1220 km in combined cycle | 820 km in combined cycle | |
| 1370 km on highway | 1030 km on highway | ||
| 960 km with real consumption | 800 km with real consumption | ||
| Skoda Rapid gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
| Kia Ceed 2015 1.6 engine: Overall, the engine is reliable and not very demanding on fuel quality. Fuel injectors tend to be noisy. Timing chain resource is relatively low. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.30 m | 4.31 m | |
| Width: | 1.71 m | 1.78 m | |
| Height: | 1.46 m | 1.47 m | |
|
Skoda Rapid is smaller. Skoda Rapid and Kia Ceed are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 415 litres | 380 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1490 litres | 1318 litres | |
|
Skoda Rapid has more luggage capacity. Skoda Rapid has 35 litres more trunk space than the Kia Ceed. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Skoda Rapid (by 172 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.9 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Skoda Rapid is 0.3 metres more than that of the Kia Ceed. | |||
| Gross weight: | 1`625 kg | 1`820 kg | |
| Net weight: | 1`170 kg | 1`196 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 455 kg | 624 kg | |
| Skoda Rapid load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 37 procentiem less than Kia Ceed. Therefore, Kia Ceed is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | average | average | |
| Skoda Rapid has slightly fewer faults. Deffect rate in annual technical inspection is similar for both cars, it's slightly higher for Kia Ceed, so Skoda Rapid quality could be a bit better. | |||
| Average price (€): | 7200 | 8600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Skoda Rapid has
|
Kia Ceed has
| |