Skoda Rapid 2017 vs Citroen C4 2015
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.0 Petrol | 1.2 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 95 HP | 131 HP | |
| Torque: | 160 NM | 230 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11 seconds | 10.8 seconds | |
|
Citroen C4 is a more dynamic driving. Skoda Rapid engine produces 36 HP less power than Citroen C4, whereas torque is 70 NM less than Citroen C4. Due to the lower power, Skoda Rapid reaches 100 km/h speed 0.2 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.5 | 4.7 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 5.7 l/100km | 6.7 l/100km | |
|
The Skoda Rapid is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Skoda Rapid consumes 0.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Citroen C4, which means that by driving the Skoda Rapid over 15,000 km in a year you can save 30 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Skoda Rapid consumes 1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Citroen C4. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1220 km in combined cycle | 1270 km in combined cycle | |
| 1370 km on highway | 1500 km on highway | ||
| 960 km with real consumption | 890 km with real consumption | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
| Citroen C4 2015 1.2 engine: Since the timing belt is immersed in oil, it doesn't last the intended 180,000 kilometers, and its wear products clog the oilways. First years of engines have been recalled due to excessive axial play in the ... More about Citroen C4 2015 1.2 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.30 m | 4.33 m | |
| Width: | 1.71 m | 1.79 m | |
| Height: | 1.46 m | 1.49 m | |
|
Skoda Rapid is smaller. Skoda Rapid is 3 cm shorter than the Citroen C4, 8 cm narrower, while the height of Skoda Rapid is 3 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 415 litres | 408 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1490 litres | 1183 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.9 meters | 10.7 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Skoda Rapid is 0.2 metres more than that of the Citroen C4. | |||
| Gross weight: | 1`625 kg | 1`790 kg | |
| Net weight: | 1`170 kg | 1`205 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 455 kg | 585 kg | |
| Skoda Rapid load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 29 procentiem less than Citroen C4. Therefore, Citroen C4 is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | below average | below average | |
| Skoda Rapid has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Citroen C4 has serious deffects in 105 percent more cases than Skoda Rapid, so Skoda Rapid quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 6200 | 6000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Skoda Rapid has
|
Citroen C4 has
| |