Skoda Rapid 2017 vs Skoda Fabia 2017
| Body: | Hatchback | Estate car / wagon | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
| Engine: | 1.0 Petrol | 1.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 95 HP | 110 HP | |
| Torque: | 160 NM | 200 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.3 seconds | 9.9 seconds | |
|
Skoda Fabia is a more dynamic driving. Skoda Rapid engine produces 15 HP less power than Skoda Fabia, whereas torque is 40 NM less than Skoda Fabia. Due to the lower power, Skoda Rapid reaches 100 km/h speed 1.4 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.6 | 4.6 | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 45 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1190 km in combined cycle | 970 km in combined cycle | |
| 1340 km on highway | 1090 km on highway | ||
| Skoda Rapid gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.30 m | 4.26 m | |
| Width: | 1.71 m | 1.73 m | |
| Height: | 1.46 m | 1.47 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Skoda Rapid is 5 cm longer than the Skoda Fabia, 3 cm narrower the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 415 litres | 530 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1490 litres | 1395 litres | |
| Despite its longer length, This could mean that the Skoda Rapid uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Skoda Rapid (by 95 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.9 meters | 10.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Skoda Rapid is 0.5 metres more than that of the Skoda Fabia, which means Skoda Rapid can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | 1`659 kg | 1`643 kg | |
| Net weight: | 1`204 kg | 1`113 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 455 kg | 530 kg | |
| Skoda Rapid load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 16 procentiem less than Skoda Fabia. Therefore, Skoda Fabia is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | average | average | |
| Skoda Fabia has slightly fewer faults. Deffect rate in annual technical inspection is similar for both cars, it's slightly higher for Skoda Rapid, so Skoda Fabia quality could be a bit better. | |||
| Average price (€): | 7400 | 5800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Skoda Rapid has
|
Skoda Fabia has
| |