Skoda Rapid 2012 vs Volkswagen Golf 2008

Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison

 
Skoda Rapid
2012 - 2017
Volkswagen Golf
2008 - 2012
Gearbox: Manual/AutomaticManual/Automatic
Wheel drive type: Front wheel drive (FWD)Front wheel drive (FWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)
Skoda Rapid is available only with front wheel drive, while Volkswagen Golf can be equipped with front wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive.
Engines: 1.2 - 1.61.4 - 2.0

Performance

Power: 75 - 122 HP80 - 210 HP
Torque: 112 - 250 NM132 - 320 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 9.5 - 13.9 seconds6.9 - 14 seconds
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison!

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 3.6 - 5.94.9 - 7.4
Skoda Rapid petrol engines consumes on average 1.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than Volkswagen Golf. On average, Skoda Rapid equipped with diesel engines consume 1.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Golf.
This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version!
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy.
Ground clearance: 136 mm (5.4 inches)140 - 150 mm (5.5 - 5.9 inches)

Dimensions

Length: 4.48 m4.20 m
Width: 1.71 m1.79 m
Height: 1.46 m1.48 m
Skoda Rapid is 28 cm longer than the Volkswagen Golf, 8 cm narrower, while the height of Skoda Rapid is 2 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: 550 litres350 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
1490 litres1305 litres
Skoda Rapid has more luggage capacity.
Skoda Rapid has 200 litres more trunk space than the Volkswagen Golf. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Skoda Rapid (by 185 litres).
Turning diameter: 10.9 meters11 meters
The turning circle of the Skoda Rapid is 0.1 metres less than that of the Volkswagen Golf.
Gross weight (kg): ~ 1`667~ 1`864
Safety:
Quality:
below average

above average
Average price (€): 62003400
Pros and Cons: Skoda Rapid has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • roomier boot
Volkswagen Golf has
  • available with 4x4 drive
  • fewer faults
  • lower price
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv