Skoda Rapid 2012 vs Skoda Fabia 2015
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Body: | Hatchback | Estate car / wagon | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
| Engines: | 1.2 - 1.6 | 1.0 - 1.4 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 75 - 122 HP | 75 - 110 HP | |
| Torque: | 112 - 250 NM | 95 - 250 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.5 - 13.9 seconds | 9.6 - 14.9 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 3.6 - 5.9 | 3.4 - 4.8 | |
|
Skoda Rapid petrol engines consumes on average 0.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than Skoda Fabia. On average, Skoda Rapid equipped with diesel engines consume 0.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Skoda Fabia. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.48 m | 4.26 m | |
| Width: | 1.71 m | 1.73 m | |
| Height: | 1.46 m | 1.47 m | |
| Skoda Rapid is 23 cm longer than the Skoda Fabia, 3 cm narrower the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 550 litres | 530 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1490 litres | 1395 litres | |
| Skoda Rapid has 20 litres more trunk space than the Skoda Fabia. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Skoda Rapid (by 95 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.9 meters | 10.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Skoda Rapid is 0.5 metres more than that of the Skoda Fabia, which means Skoda Rapid can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`667 | ~ 1`615 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | below average | average | |
| Average price (€): | 6200 | 7200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Skoda Rapid has
|
Skoda Fabia has
| |