Skoda Rapid 2012 vs Skoda Scala 2019
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.2 - 1.6 | 1.0 - 1.6 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 75 - 122 HP | 115 - 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 112 - 250 NM | 250 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.5 - 13.9 seconds | 8.2 - 10.3 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 3.6 - 5.9 | 4.1 - 5.0 | |
|
Skoda Rapid petrol engines consumes on average 0.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than Skoda Scala. On average, Skoda Rapid equipped with diesel engines consume 0.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Skoda Scala. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.48 m | 4.36 m | |
| Width: | 1.71 m | 1.79 m | |
| Height: | 1.46 m | 1.47 m | |
| Skoda Rapid is 12 cm longer than the Skoda Scala, 9 cm narrower, while the height of Skoda Rapid is 1 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 550 litres | 467 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1490 litres | no data | |
|
Skoda Rapid has more luggage capacity. Skoda Rapid has 83 litres more trunk space than the Skoda Scala. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.9 meters | 10.9 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`667 | ~ 1`730 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Skoda Scala is better rated in child safety tests. The Skoda Scala scores higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | below average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 6200 | 17 000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Skoda Rapid has
|
Skoda Scala has
| |