Skoda Rapid 2012 vs Hyundai i30 2010

Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison

 
Skoda Rapid
2012 - 2017
Hyundai i30
2010 - 2012
Gearbox: Manual/AutomaticManual/Automatic
Engines: 1.2 - 1.61.4 - 1.6

Performance

Power: 75 - 122 HP90 - 126 HP
Torque: 112 - 250 NM137 - 260 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 9.5 - 13.9 seconds11 - 14.9 seconds
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison!

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 3.6 - 5.94.4 - 6.9
Skoda Rapid petrol engines consumes on average 1 litres less fuel per 100 km than Hyundai i30. On average, Skoda Rapid equipped with diesel engines consume 1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Hyundai i30.
This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version!

Dimensions

Length: 4.48 m4.28 m
Width: 1.71 m1.78 m
Height: 1.46 m1.48 m
Skoda Rapid is 20 cm longer than the Hyundai i30, 7 cm narrower, while the height of Skoda Rapid is 2 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: 550 litres340 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
1490 litres1250 litres
Skoda Rapid has more luggage capacity.
Skoda Rapid has 210 litres more trunk space than the Hyundai i30. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Skoda Rapid (by 240 litres).
Turning diameter: 10.9 meters10.2 meters
The turning circle of the Skoda Rapid is 0.7 metres more than that of the Hyundai i30, which means Skoda Rapid can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): ~ 1`667~ 1`777
Safety: no data
Quality:
below average

below average
Average price (€): 70003400
Pros and Cons: Skoda Rapid has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • roomier boot
  • fewer faults
Hyundai i30 has
  • better manoeuvrability
  • lower price
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv