Skoda Rapid 2019 vs Mazda 3 2019
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | Front wheel drive (FWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Skoda Rapid is available only with front wheel drive, while Mazda 3 can be equipped with front wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive. | |||
| Engines: | 1.4 - 1.6 (petrol) | 1.5 - 2.5 (petrol, diesel) | |
| Both cars are available with petrol engines. Mazda 3 is available also with diesel engines. Diesel engines typically offer better fuel efficiency and higher torque compared to other engine types. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 90 - 125 HP | 116 - 250 HP | |
| Torque: | 155 - 200 NM | 150 - 434 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.2 - 11.8 seconds | 8.1 - 12.4 seconds | |
| In general, Mazda 3 are available with more powerful and dynamic engines than Skoda Rapid. Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.4 - 6.1 | 4.1 - 9.0 | |
|
Skoda Rapid petrol engines consumes on average 0.9 litres less fuel per 100 km than Mazda 3. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.51 m | 4.46 m | |
| Width: | 1.71 m | 1.80 m | |
| Height: | 1.47 m | 1.44 m | |
| Skoda Rapid is 5 cm longer than the Mazda 3, 9 cm narrower, while the height of Skoda Rapid is 3 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 530 litres | 569 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1460 litres | 1026 litres | |
| Despite its longer length, This could mean that the Skoda Rapid uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Skoda Rapid (by 434 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | 11.4 meters | |
| Gross weight: | ~ 1`684 kg | ~ 1`914 kg | |
| Net weight: | ~ 1`224 kg | ~ 1`400 kg | |
| Load capacity: | ~ 460 kg | ~ 514 kg | |
| Skoda Rapid load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 12 procentiem less than Mazda 3. Therefore, Mazda 3 is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | low | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 21 600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Skoda Rapid has
|
Mazda 3 has
| |