Skoda Rapid 2017 vs Volkswagen Golf 2017
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | Front wheel drive (FWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Skoda Rapid is available only with front wheel drive, while Volkswagen Golf can be equipped with front wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive. | |||
| Engines: | 1.0 - 1.6 | 1.0 - 2.0 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 90 - 125 HP | 85 - 310 HP | |
| Torque: | 160 - 250 NM | 175 - 400 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.9 - 11.7 seconds | 4.6 - 11.9 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.0 - 4.8 | 4.2 - 7.9 | |
|
Skoda Rapid petrol engines consumes on average 1.9 litres less fuel per 100 km than Volkswagen Golf. On average, Skoda Rapid equipped with diesel engines consume 0.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Golf. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.30 m | 4.27 m | |
| Width: | 1.71 m | 1.80 m | |
| Height: | 1.46 m | 1.44 m | |
| Skoda Rapid is 4 cm longer than the Volkswagen Golf, 9 cm narrower, while the height of Skoda Rapid is 2 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 415 litres | 380 litres | |
|
Skoda Rapid has more luggage capacity. Skoda Rapid has 35 litres more trunk space than the Volkswagen Golf. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.9 meters | 10.9 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`684 | ~ 1`891 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | average | average | |
| Average price (€): | 8000 | 17 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Skoda Rapid has
|
Volkswagen Golf has
| |