Skoda Rapid 2017 vs Skoda Fabia 2015
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
Body: | Hatchback | Estate car / wagon | |
---|---|---|---|
Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
Engines: | 1.0 - 1.6 | 1.0 - 1.4 | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 90 - 125 HP | 75 - 110 HP | |
Torque: | 160 - 250 NM | 95 - 250 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.9 - 11.7 seconds | 9.6 - 14.9 seconds | |
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.0 - 4.8 | 3.4 - 4.8 | |
On average, the Skoda Rapid petrol engines consume nearly the same amount of fuel per 100 km as Skoda Fabia. On average, Skoda Rapid equipped with diesel engines consume 0.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Skoda Fabia. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.30 m | 4.26 m | |
Width: | 1.71 m | 1.73 m | |
Height: | 1.46 m | 1.47 m | |
Both cars are similar in size. Skoda Rapid is 5 cm longer than the Skoda Fabia, 3 cm narrower the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 415 litres | 530 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1395 litres | |
Skoda Fabia has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Skoda Rapid has 115 litres less trunk space than the Skoda Fabia. This could mean that the Skoda Rapid uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
Turning diameter: | 10.9 meters | 10.4 meters | |
The turning circle of the Skoda Rapid is 0.5 metres more than that of the Skoda Fabia, which means Skoda Rapid can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`684 | ~ 1`615 | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | average | average | |
Average price (€): | 8000 | 7200 | |
Pros and Cons: |
|
Skoda Fabia has
| |