Skoda Rapid 2017 vs Audi A3 2016
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | Front wheel drive (FWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Skoda Rapid is available only with front wheel drive, while Audi A3 can be equipped with front wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive. | |||
Engines: | 1.0 - 1.6 (petrol, diesel) | 1.0 - 2.0 (petrol, diesel, hybrid) | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 90 - 125 HP | 110 - 190 HP | |
Torque: | 160 - 250 NM | 200 - 380 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.9 - 11.7 seconds | 6.2 - 10.7 seconds | |
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.0 - 4.8 | 5.0 - 5.7 | |
Skoda Rapid petrol engines consumes on average 0.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than Audi A3. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.30 m | 4.31 m | |
Width: | 1.71 m | 1.79 m | |
Height: | 1.46 m | 1.44 m | |
Skoda Rapid is smaller, but slightly higher. Skoda Rapid and Audi A3 are practically the same length. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 415 litres | 380 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1220 litres | |
Skoda Rapid has more luggage capacity. Skoda Rapid has 35 litres more trunk space than the Audi A3. | |||
Turning diameter: | 10.9 meters | 11 meters | |
The turning circle of the Skoda Rapid is 0.1 metres less than that of the Audi A3. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`684 | ~ 1`852 | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | average | high | |
Average price (€): | 8000 | 15 800 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Skoda Rapid has
|
Audi A3 has
| |