Skoda Octavia 2000 vs Skoda Octavia 2009
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 1.8 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 115 HP | 160 HP | |
| Torque: | 170 NM | 250 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.3 seconds | 7.9 seconds | |
|
Skoda Octavia 2009 is a more dynamic driving. Skoda Octavia 2000 engine produces 45 HP less power than Skoda Octavia 2009, whereas torque is 80 NM less than Skoda Octavia 2009. Due to the lower power, Skoda Octavia 2000 reaches 100 km/h speed 3.4 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.0 | 7.0 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 8.0 l/100km | 7.6 l/100km | |
|
The Skoda Octavia 2009 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Skoda Octavia 2000 consumes 1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Skoda Octavia 2009, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Skoda Octavia 2000 could require 150 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Skoda Octavia 2000 consumes 0.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Skoda Octavia 2009. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 55 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 680 km in combined cycle | 780 km in combined cycle | |
| 880 km on highway | 980 km on highway | ||
| 680 km with real consumption | 720 km with real consumption | ||
| Skoda Octavia 2009 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.51 m | 4.57 m | |
| Width: | 1.73 m | 1.77 m | |
| Height: | 1.45 m | 1.45 m | |
|
Skoda Octavia 2000 is smaller. Skoda Octavia 2000 is 6 cm shorter than the Skoda Octavia 2009, 4 cm narrower the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 548 litres | 580 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1512 litres | 1630 litres | |
|
Skoda Octavia 2009 has more luggage space. Skoda Octavia 2000 has 32 litres less trunk space than the Skoda Octavia 2009. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Skoda Octavia 2009 (by 118 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.8 meters | 10.2 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Skoda Octavia 2000 is 0.6 metres more than that of the Skoda Octavia 2009, which means Skoda Octavia 2000 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Power steering: | Hydraulic power steering | Electric power steering | |
| Hydraulic power steering is technologically more complex, louder, increases fuel consumption and requires more servicing. It has the advantages of more power, less strain on the car's electrical system and better feedback (feeling) when steering. | |||
| Gross weight: | 1`825 kg | 1`980 kg | |
| Net weight: | 1`275 kg | 1`395 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 550 kg | 585 kg | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | Skoda Octavia 2009 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Skoda Octavia 2000 has serious deffects in 340 percent more cases than Skoda Octavia 2009, so Skoda Octavia 2009 quality is probably significantly better | ||
| Average price (€): | 800 | 3200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Skoda Octavia has
|
Skoda Octavia has
| |