Skoda Octavia 2006 vs Volvo V40 1999
Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 1.9 Diesel | 1.9 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 100 HP | 95 HP | |
Torque: | 240 NM | 190 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.5 seconds | 12.5 seconds | |
Skoda Octavia engine produces 5 HP more power than Volvo V40, whereas torque is 50 NM more than Volvo V40. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.2 | 5.6 | |
Real fuel consumption: | 5.9 l/100km | 6.0 l/100km | |
The Skoda Octavia is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Skoda Octavia consumes 0.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volvo V40, which means that by driving the Skoda Octavia over 15,000 km in a year you can save 60 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Skoda Octavia consumes 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volvo V40. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 60 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 1050 km in combined cycle | 1070 km in combined cycle | |
930 km with real consumption | 1000 km with real consumption | ||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.51 m | 4.48 m | |
Width: | 1.73 m | 1.72 m | |
Height: | 1.46 m | 1.41 m | |
Skoda Octavia is larger. Skoda Octavia is 3 cm longer than the Volvo V40, 1 cm wider, while the height of Skoda Octavia is 5 cm higher. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 548 litres | no data | |
Turning diameter: | 10.8 meters | 10.6 meters | |
The turning circle of the Skoda Octavia is 0.2 metres more than that of the Volvo V40. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | no data | no data | |
Safety: | no data | ||
Quality: | average | below average | |
Skoda Octavia has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Volvo V40 has serious deffects in 415 percent more cases than Skoda Octavia, so Skoda Octavia quality is probably significantly better | |||
Average price (€): | 1600 | 600 | |
Rating in user reviews: | 7.5/10 | 6.4/10 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Skoda Octavia has
|
Volvo V40 has
| |