Skoda Octavia 2005 vs Volvo V50 2006
Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 1.6 Petrol | 1.6 Petrol | |
Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 102 HP | 100 HP | |
Torque: | 148 NM | 150 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 14 seconds | 12 seconds | |
Volvo V50 is a more dynamic driving. Skoda Octavia engine produces 2 HP more power than Volvo V50, but torque is 2 NM less than Volvo V50. Despite the higher power, Skoda Octavia reaches 100 km/h speed 2 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.8 | 7.2 | |
Real fuel consumption: | 8.1 l/100km | 7.7 l/100km | |
The Volvo V50 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Skoda Octavia consumes 0.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volvo V50, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Skoda Octavia could require 90 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Skoda Octavia consumes 0.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volvo V50. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 55 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 700 km in combined cycle | 760 km in combined cycle | |
940 km on highway | 940 km on highway | ||
670 km with real consumption | 710 km with real consumption | ||
Volvo V50 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Engines | |||
Average engine lifespan: | 480'000 km | 440'000 km | |
Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Skoda Octavia engine could be longer. | |||
Engine production duration: | 11 years | 6 years | |
Engine spread: | Installed on at least 5 other car models, including Volkswagen Golf, Volkswagen Polo, Seat Toledo, Seat Ibiza | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Volvo S40, Volvo C30 | |
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Skoda Octavia might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Hydraulic tappets: | yes | no | |
The Skoda Octavia engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.57 m | 4.51 m | |
Width: | 1.77 m | 1.77 m | |
Height: | 1.47 m | 1.45 m | |
Both cars are similar in size. Skoda Octavia is 6 cm longer than the Volvo V50, width is practically the same , while the height of Skoda Octavia is 2 cm higher. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 580 litres | 417 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1625 litres | 1307 litres | |
Skoda Octavia has more luggage capacity. Skoda Octavia has 163 litres more trunk space than the Volvo V50. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Skoda Octavia (by 318 litres). | |||
Turning diameter: | 10 meters | 10.6 meters | |
The turning circle of the Skoda Octavia is 0.6 metres less than that of the Volvo V50, which means Skoda Octavia can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 1`965 | 1`850 | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | average | average | |
Skoda Octavia has slightly fewer faults. Deffect rate in annual technical inspection is similar for both cars, it's slightly higher for Volvo V50, so Skoda Octavia quality could be a bit better. | |||
Average price (€): | 2400 | 2200 | |
Rating in user reviews: | 7.9/10 | 6.4/10 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Skoda Octavia has
|
Volvo V50 has
| |