Skoda Octavia 2009 vs Chevrolet Lacetti 2005
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 1.6 Petrol | |
| Diesel (Skoda Octavia) engines typically outperform gasoline engines in terms of fuel efficiency and low-end torque. This makes them more economical and better suited for towing or long-distance travel. However, gasoline (Chevrolet Lacetti) engines mostly are lighter, quieter, and offer better acceleration and responsiveness, especially in smaller vehicles. For more information, see the article "Diesel or Petrol: Fuel Economy and Key Differences." | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 140 HP | 109 HP | |
| Torque: | 320 NM | 150 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.7 seconds | 11.4 seconds | |
|
Skoda Octavia is more dynamic to drive. Skoda Octavia engine produces 31 HP more power than Chevrolet Lacetti, whereas torque is 170 NM more than Chevrolet Lacetti. Thanks to more power Skoda Octavia reaches 100 km/h speed 1.7 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.9 | 7.8 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.4 l/100km | 8.2 l/100km | |
|
The Skoda Octavia is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Skoda Octavia consumes 1.9 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Chevrolet Lacetti, which means that by driving the Skoda Octavia over 15,000 km in a year you can save 285 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Skoda Octavia consumes 1.8 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Chevrolet Lacetti. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 930 km in combined cycle | 760 km in combined cycle | |
| 1140 km on highway | 950 km on highway | ||
| 850 km with real consumption | 730 km with real consumption | ||
| Skoda Octavia gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
| Chevrolet Lacetti 2005 1.6 engine: Durable, easy to repair, long-lasting engine, not very demanding on fuel quality.
Engine often leaks oil, which tends to cause other problems. The EGR valve can also cause problems, and many users choose to ... More about Chevrolet Lacetti 2005 1.6 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.57 m | 4.58 m | |
| Width: | 1.77 m | 1.73 m | |
| Height: | 1.45 m | 1.46 m | |
| Skoda Octavia is 1 cm shorter than the Chevrolet Lacetti, 5 cm wider, while the height of Skoda Octavia is 1 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 580 litres | 400 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1630 litres | 1410 litres | |
|
Skoda Octavia has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, The Chevrolet Lacetti may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Skoda Octavia (by 220 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.2 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight: | 2`030 kg | 1`765 kg | |
| Net weight: | 1`445 kg | 1`250 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 585 kg | 515 kg | |
| Skoda Octavia load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 12 procentiem more than Chevrolet Lacetti. Therefore, Skoda Octavia is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 3400 | 1400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Skoda Octavia has
|
Chevrolet Lacetti has
| |