Skoda Octavia 2013 vs Volvo V60 2016
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 220 HP | 367 HP | |
| Torque: | 350 NM | 470 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.1 seconds | 4.8 seconds | |
|
Volvo V60 is a more dynamic driving. Skoda Octavia engine produces 147 HP less power than Volvo V60, whereas torque is 120 NM less than Volvo V60. Due to the lower power, Skoda Octavia reaches 100 km/h speed 2.3 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.4 | 8.1 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 8.7 l/100km | 12.5 l/100km | |
|
The Skoda Octavia is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Skoda Octavia consumes 1.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volvo V60, which means that by driving the Skoda Octavia over 15,000 km in a year you can save 255 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Skoda Octavia consumes 3.8 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volvo V60. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 50 litres | 67 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 780 km in combined cycle | 820 km in combined cycle | |
| 570 km with real consumption | 530 km with real consumption | ||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Volvo V60 2016 2.0 engine: Engines in this series are often associated with oil consumption issues, which many owners report over time.
In the initial production years, a common weakness was the coolant reservoir hose, which had a ... More about Volvo V60 2016 2.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.69 m | 4.63 m | |
| Width: | 1.81 m | 1.87 m | |
| Height: | 1.45 m | 1.48 m | |
| Skoda Octavia is 6 cm longer than the Volvo V60, 5 cm narrower, while the height of Skoda Octavia is 4 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 610 litres | 430 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1740 litres | no data | |
|
Skoda Octavia has more luggage capacity. Skoda Octavia has 180 litres more trunk space than the Volvo V60. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.1 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`953 | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | below average | average | |
| Volvo V60 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Skoda Octavia has serious deffects in 10 percent more cases than Volvo V60, so Volvo V60 quality is probably slightly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 8000 | 13 400 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 8.6/10 | 9.3/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Skoda Octavia has
|
Volvo V60 has
| |