Skoda Octavia 2013 vs BMW 3 series 2012

 
Skoda Octavia
2013 - 2017
BMW 3 series
2012 - 2015
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 2.0 Diesel2.0 Diesel

Performance

Power: 150 HP184 HP
Torque: 320 NM380 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 8.6 seconds7.7 seconds
BMW 3 series is a more dynamic driving.
Skoda Octavia engine produces 34 HP less power than BMW 3 series, whereas torque is 60 NM less than BMW 3 series. Due to the lower power, Skoda Octavia reaches 100 km/h speed 0.9 seconds later.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 4.24.7
Real fuel consumption: 5.6 l/100km6.0 l/100km
The Skoda Octavia is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
By specification Skoda Octavia consumes 0.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the BMW 3 series, which means that by driving the Skoda Octavia over 15,000 km in a year you can save 75 litres of fuel.
By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Skoda Octavia consumes 0.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the BMW 3 series.
Fuel tank capacity: 50 litres57 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 1190 km in combined cycle1210 km in combined cycle
1350 km on highway1420 km on highway
890 km with real consumption950 km with real consumption
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy.

Drive type

Wheel drive type: Front wheel drive (FWD)Rear wheel drive (RWD)
BMW 3 sērija 2012 2.0 engine: Because of problems with the timing chain, which tends to stretch at 100,000 km, the BMW N47 engine is sometimes called the worst BMW engine. Replacing the timing chain also requires removing the engine from ...  More about BMW 3 sērija 2012 2.0 engine 

Dimensions

Length: 4.66 m4.62 m
Width: 1.81 m1.81 m
Height: 1.46 m1.43 m
Both cars are similar in size. Skoda Octavia is 4 cm longer than the BMW 3 series, width is practically the same , while the height of Skoda Octavia is 3 cm higher.
Trunk capacity: 610 litres495 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
1740 litres1500 litres
Skoda Octavia has more luggage capacity.
Skoda Octavia has 115 litres more trunk space than the BMW 3 series. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Skoda Octavia (by 240 litres).
Turning diameter: 11.1 meters11.3 meters
The turning circle of the Skoda Octavia is 0.2 metres less than that of the BMW 3 series.
Gross weight (kg): 1`9172`040
Safety:
BMW 3 series scores higher in safety tests. The BMW 3 series scores significantly higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests.
Quality:
average

below average
Skoda Octavia has fewer problems.
According to annual technical inspection data BMW 3 series has serious deffects in 10 percent more cases than Skoda Octavia, so Skoda Octavia quality is probably slightly better
Average price (€): 72009400
Pros and Cons: Skoda Octavia has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • roomier boot
  • fewer faults
  • lower price
BMW 3 sērija has
  • more power
  • more dynamic
  • higher safety
  • better safety assist technologies
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv