Skoda Octavia 2013 vs BMW 3 series 2012
| Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 105 HP | 184 HP | |
| Torque: | 250 NM | 380 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11 seconds | 7.6 seconds | |
|
BMW 3 series is a more dynamic driving. Skoda Octavia engine produces 79 HP less power than BMW 3 series, whereas torque is 130 NM less than BMW 3 series. Due to the lower power, Skoda Octavia reaches 100 km/h speed 3.4 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 3.8 | 4.6 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 5.3 l/100km | 6.3 l/100km | |
|
The Skoda Octavia is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Skoda Octavia consumes 0.8 litres less fuel per 100 km than the BMW 3 series, which means that by driving the Skoda Octavia over 15,000 km in a year you can save 120 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Skoda Octavia consumes 1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the BMW 3 series. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 50 litres | 57 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1310 km in combined cycle | 1230 km in combined cycle | |
| 1510 km on highway | 1460 km on highway | ||
| 940 km with real consumption | 900 km with real consumption | ||
| Skoda Octavia gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | |
| BMW 3 sērija 2012 2.0 engine: Because of problems with the timing chain, which tends to stretch at 100,000 km, the BMW N47 engine is sometimes called the worst BMW engine. Replacing the timing chain also requires removing the engine from ... More about BMW 3 sērija 2012 2.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.66 m | 4.62 m | |
| Width: | 1.81 m | 1.81 m | |
| Height: | 1.46 m | 1.43 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Skoda Octavia is 4 cm longer than the BMW 3 series, width is practically the same , while the height of Skoda Octavia is 3 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 610 litres | 495 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1740 litres | 1500 litres | |
|
Skoda Octavia has more luggage capacity. Skoda Octavia has 115 litres more trunk space than the BMW 3 series. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Skoda Octavia (by 240 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.1 meters | 11.3 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Skoda Octavia is 0.2 metres less than that of the BMW 3 series. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`892 | 2`050 | |
| Safety: | |||
| BMW 3 series scores higher in safety tests. The BMW 3 series scores significantly higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | average | below average | |
| Skoda Octavia has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data BMW 3 series has serious deffects in 10 percent more cases than Skoda Octavia, so Skoda Octavia quality is probably slightly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 7200 | 9400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Skoda Octavia has
|
BMW 3 sērija has
| |