Skoda Octavia 1999 vs BMW 3 series 1998

 
Skoda Octavia
1999 - 2000
BMW 3 series
1998 - 2001
Body: HatchbackSedan
The hatchback generally has more luggage space thanks to a larger trunk door opening and the ability to convert the rear of the passenger compartment into luggage space. Sedans tend to be quieter than hatchbacks, due to a more isolated rear area.
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 1.9 Diesel2.0 Diesel

Performance

Power: 110 HP136 HP
Torque: 235 NM280 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 11.9 seconds9.9 seconds
BMW 3 series is a more dynamic driving.
Skoda Octavia engine produces 26 HP less power than BMW 3 series, whereas torque is 45 NM less than BMW 3 series. Due to the lower power, Skoda Octavia reaches 100 km/h speed 2 seconds later.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 5.25.7
Real fuel consumption: 5.6 l/100km6.3 l/100km
The Skoda Octavia is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
By specification Skoda Octavia consumes 0.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the BMW 3 series, which means that by driving the Skoda Octavia over 15,000 km in a year you can save 75 litres of fuel.
By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Skoda Octavia consumes 0.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the BMW 3 series.
Fuel tank capacity: 55 litres63 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 1050 km in combined cycle1100 km in combined cycle
1270 km on highway1400 km on highway
980 km with real consumption1000 km with real consumption

Drive type

Wheel drive type: Front wheel drive (FWD)Rear wheel drive (RWD)

Dimensions

Length: 4.51 m4.47 m
Width: 1.73 m1.74 m
Height: 1.43 m1.42 m
Both cars are similar in size. Skoda Octavia is 4 cm longer than the BMW 3 series, 1 cm narrower, while the height of Skoda Octavia is 1 cm higher.
Trunk capacity: 528 litres440 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
1330 litresno data
Skoda Octavia has more luggage capacity.
Skoda Octavia has 88 litres more trunk space than the BMW 3 series.
Turning diameter: 10.8 meters10 meters
The turning circle of the Skoda Octavia is 0.8 metres more than that of the BMW 3 series, which means Skoda Octavia can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): 1`8451`875
Safety: no datano data
Quality:
above average

below average
Skoda Octavia has fewer problems.
According to annual technical inspection data BMW 3 series has serious deffects in 30 percent more cases than Skoda Octavia, so Skoda Octavia quality is probably significantly better
Average price (€): 10002000
Pros and Cons: Skoda Octavia has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • roomier boot
  • fewer faults
  • lower price
BMW 3 sērija has
  • more power
  • more dynamic
  • better manoeuvrability
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv