Skoda Octavia 1997 vs Mazda 626 1997
Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 1.6 Petrol | 1.8 Petrol | |
Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 101 HP | 90 HP | |
Torque: | 145 NM | 145 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.2 seconds | 12.6 seconds | |
Skoda Octavia is more dynamic to drive. Skoda Octavia engine produces 11 HP more power than Mazda 626, the torque is the same for both cars. Thanks to more power Skoda Octavia reaches 100 km/h speed 0.4 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.8 | 7.6 | |
Real fuel consumption: | 7.6 l/100km | 8.3 l/100km | |
The Skoda Octavia is a better choice in terms of fuel economy based on user-reported consumption, although the specification shows otherwise. By specification Skoda Octavia consumes 0.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mazda 626, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Skoda Octavia could require 30 litres more fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Skoda Octavia consumes 0.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mazda 626. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 64 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 700 km in combined cycle | 840 km in combined cycle | |
900 km on highway | 1030 km on highway | ||
720 km with real consumption | 770 km with real consumption | ||
Mazda 626 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Engines | |||
Average engine lifespan: | 480'000 km | 560'000 km | |
Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Mazda 626 engine could be longer. | |||
Engine production duration: | 11 years | 7 years | |
Engine spread: | Installed on at least 5 other car models, including Volkswagen Golf, Volkswagen Polo, Seat Ibiza, Seat Toledo | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Mazda 323, Mazda Premacy | |
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Skoda Octavia might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Hydraulic tappets: | yes | no | |
The Skoda Octavia engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Skoda Octavia 1997 1.6 engine: This is a simple and reliable engine with an impressive lifespan when properly maintained. However, many of its issues stem from air leaks, so checking hoses and the intake manifold is essential. The ignition ... More about Skoda Octavia 1997 1.6 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.51 m | 4.58 m | |
Width: | 1.73 m | 1.71 m | |
Height: | 1.43 m | 1.43 m | |
Both cars are similar in size. Skoda Octavia is 7 cm shorter than the Mazda 626, 2 cm wider the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 528 litres | 502 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1330 litres | no data | |
Skoda Octavia has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Skoda Octavia has 26 litres more trunk space than the Mazda 626. The Mazda 626 may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
Turning diameter: | 10.8 meters | 10.4 meters | |
The turning circle of the Skoda Octavia is 0.4 metres more than that of the Mazda 626, which means Skoda Octavia can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 1`765 | 1`680 | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | above average | average | |
Skoda Octavia has slightly fewer faults. Deffect rate in annual technical inspection is similar for both cars, it's slightly higher for Mazda 626, so Skoda Octavia quality could be a bit better. | |||
Average price (€): | 1000 | 1000 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Skoda Octavia has
|
Mazda 626 has
| |