Skoda Octavia 1997 vs Mazda 626 1997

 
Skoda Octavia
1997 - 2000
Mazda 626
1997 - 1999
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 1.6 Petrol1.8 Petrol
Camshaft drive: Timing beltTiming belt

Performance

Power: 101 HP90 HP
Torque: 145 NM145 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 12.2 seconds12.6 seconds
Skoda Octavia is more dynamic to drive.
Skoda Octavia engine produces 11 HP more power than Mazda 626, the torque is the same for both cars. Thanks to more power Skoda Octavia reaches 100 km/h speed 0.4 seconds faster.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 7.87.6
Real fuel consumption: 7.6 l/100km8.3 l/100km
The Skoda Octavia is a better choice in terms of fuel economy based on user-reported consumption, although the specification shows otherwise.
By specification Skoda Octavia consumes 0.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mazda 626, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Skoda Octavia could require 30 litres more fuel.
But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Skoda Octavia consumes 0.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mazda 626.
Fuel tank capacity: 55 litres64 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 700 km in combined cycle840 km in combined cycle
900 km on highway1030 km on highway
720 km with real consumption770 km with real consumption
Mazda 626 gets more mileage on one fuel tank.
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy.

Engines

Average engine lifespan: 480'000 km560'000 km
Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Mazda 626 engine could be longer.
Engine production duration: 11 years7 years
Engine spread: Installed on at least 5 other car models, including Volkswagen Golf, Volkswagen Polo, Seat Ibiza, Seat ToledoInstalled on at least 2 other car models, including Mazda 323, Mazda Premacy
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Skoda Octavia might be a better choice in this respect.
Hydraulic tappets: yesno
The Skoda Octavia engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure.
Skoda Octavia 1997 1.6 engine: This is a simple and reliable engine with an impressive lifespan when properly maintained. However, many of its issues stem from air leaks, so checking hoses and the intake manifold is essential. The ignition ...  More about Skoda Octavia 1997 1.6 engine 

Dimensions

Length: 4.51 m4.58 m
Width: 1.73 m1.71 m
Height: 1.43 m1.43 m
Both cars are similar in size. Skoda Octavia is 7 cm shorter than the Mazda 626, 2 cm wider the height of the cars does not differ significantly.
Trunk capacity: 528 litres502 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
1330 litresno data
Skoda Octavia has more luggage capacity.
Even though the car is shorter, Skoda Octavia has 26 litres more trunk space than the Mazda 626. The Mazda 626 may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers.
Turning diameter: 10.8 meters10.4 meters
The turning circle of the Skoda Octavia is 0.4 metres more than that of the Mazda 626, which means Skoda Octavia can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): 1`7651`680
Safety: no datano data
Quality:
above average

average
Skoda Octavia has slightly fewer faults.
Deffect rate in annual technical inspection is similar for both cars, it's slightly higher for Mazda 626, so Skoda Octavia quality could be a bit better.
Average price (€): 10001000
Pros and Cons: Skoda Octavia has
  • more power
Mazda 626 has
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • longer expected engine lifespan
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv