Skoda Octavia 1997 vs Mazda 6 2002

 
Skoda Octavia
1997 - 2000
Mazda 6
2002 - 2005
Body: HatchbackEstate car / wagon
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 1.6 Petrol1.8 Petrol
Camshaft drive: Timing beltTiming chain
Timing belt usually needs to be replaced more often than the chain, but it is usually significantly cheaper. Timing belt motors are generally quieter and less vibrating than chain motors.

Performance

Power: 101 HP120 HP
Torque: 145 NM165 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 12.2 seconds11.2 seconds
Mazda 6 is a more dynamic driving.
Skoda Octavia engine produces 19 HP less power than Mazda 6, whereas torque is 20 NM less than Mazda 6. Due to the lower power, Skoda Octavia reaches 100 km/h speed 1 seconds later.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 7.88.3
Real fuel consumption: 7.6 l/100km8.2 l/100km
The Skoda Octavia is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
By specification Skoda Octavia consumes 0.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mazda 6, which means that by driving the Skoda Octavia over 15,000 km in a year you can save 75 litres of fuel.
By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Skoda Octavia consumes 0.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mazda 6.
Fuel tank capacity: 55 litres64 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 700 km in combined cycle770 km in combined cycle
900 km on highway1010 km on highway
720 km with real consumption780 km with real consumption
Mazda 6 gets more mileage on one fuel tank.

Engines

Average engine lifespan: 480'000 km390'000 km
Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Skoda Octavia engine could be longer.
Engine production duration: 11 years10 years
Engine spread: Installed on at least 5 other car models, including Volkswagen Golf, Volkswagen Polo, Seat Ibiza, Seat ToledoUsed only for this car
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Skoda Octavia might be a better choice in this respect.
Hydraulic tappets: yesno
The Skoda Octavia engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure.
Skoda Octavia 1997 1.6 engine: This is a simple and reliable engine with an impressive lifespan when properly maintained. However, many of its issues stem from air leaks, so checking hoses and the intake manifold is essential. The ignition ...  More about Skoda Octavia 1997 1.6 engine 

Mazda 6 2002 1.8 engine: The engine often has an unstable idle speed. The thermostat, cooling pump, and alternator are weak points.

Dimensions

Length: 4.51 m4.69 m
Width: 1.73 m1.78 m
Height: 1.43 m1.45 m
Skoda Octavia is smaller.
Skoda Octavia is 18 cm shorter than the Mazda 6, 5 cm narrower, while the height of Skoda Octavia is 2 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: 528 litres505 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
1330 litres1712 litres
Even though the car is shorter, Skoda Octavia has 23 litres more trunk space than the Mazda 6. The Mazda 6 may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Mazda 6 (by 382 litres).
Turning diameter: 10.8 meters10.8 meters
Gross weight (kg): 1`7651`900
Safety: no data
Quality:Mazda 6 has fewer problems.
According to annual technical inspection data Skoda Octavia has serious deffects in 30 percent more cases than Mazda 6, so Mazda 6 quality is probably significantly better
Average price (€): 10001000
Pros and Cons: Skoda Octavia has
  • timing belt engine
  • lower fuel consumption
  • longer expected engine lifespan
  • lower price
Mazda 6 has
  • timing chain engine
  • more power
  • more dynamic
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • fewer faults
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv