Skoda Octavia 1997 vs Kia Shuma 1998

 
Skoda Octavia
1997 - 2000
Kia Shuma
1998 - 2001
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 1.6 Petrol1.5 Petrol
Camshaft drive: Timing beltTiming belt

Performance

Power: 75 HP88 HP
Torque: 135 NM135 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 14.4 seconds13.8 seconds
Kia Shuma is a more dynamic driving.
Skoda Octavia engine produces 13 HP less power than Kia Shuma, the torque is the same for both cars. Due to the lower power, Skoda Octavia reaches 100 km/h speed 0.6 seconds later.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 7.67.9
Skoda Octavia consumes 0.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Kia Shuma, which means that by driving the Skoda Octavia over 15,000 km in a year you can save 45 litres of fuel.
Fuel tank capacity: 55 litres50 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 720 km in combined cycle630 km in combined cycle
940 km on highway790 km on highway
Skoda Octavia gets more mileage on one fuel tank.
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy.

Engines

Average engine lifespan: 460'000 km330'000 km
Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Skoda Octavia engine could be longer.
Engine production duration: 5 years9 years
Engine spread: Installed on at least 6 other car models, including Volkswagen Golf, Volkswagen Polo, Seat Ibiza, Seat CordobaUsed also on Kia Sephia
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts.

Dimensions

Length: 4.51 m4.48 m
Width: 1.73 m1.71 m
Height: 1.43 m1.42 m
Both cars are similar in size. Skoda Octavia is 3 cm longer than the Kia Shuma, 2 cm wider, while the height of Skoda Octavia is 1 cm higher.
Trunk capacity: 528 litres328 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
1330 litres780 litres
Skoda Octavia has more luggage capacity.
Skoda Octavia has 200 litres more trunk space than the Kia Shuma. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Skoda Octavia (by 550 litres).
Turning diameter: 10.8 meters9.8 meters
The turning circle of the Skoda Octavia is 1 metres more than that of the Kia Shuma, which means Skoda Octavia can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): 1`7401`600
Safety: no datano data
Quality:
above average
no data
Average price (€): 10001000
Pros and Cons: Skoda Octavia has
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • longer expected engine lifespan
  • roomier boot
Kia Shuma has
  • more power
  • better manoeuvrability
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv