Skoda Octavia 2000 vs Ford Focus 2004
Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing chain | |
Timing belt usually needs to be replaced more often than the chain, but it is usually significantly cheaper. Timing belt motors are generally quieter and less vibrating than chain motors. | |||
Performance | |||
Power: | 115 HP | 145 HP | |
Torque: | 170 NM | 185 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.8 seconds | 9.2 seconds | |
Ford Focus is a more dynamic driving. Skoda Octavia engine produces 30 HP less power than Ford Focus, whereas torque is 15 NM less than Ford Focus. Due to the lower power, Skoda Octavia reaches 100 km/h speed 1.6 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.0 | 7.1 | |
Real fuel consumption: | 8.2 l/100km | 8.2 l/100km | |
The Ford Focus is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Skoda Octavia consumes 0.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Ford Focus, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Skoda Octavia could require 135 litres more fuel. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 55 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 680 km in combined cycle | 770 km in combined cycle | |
900 km on highway | 1010 km on highway | ||
670 km with real consumption | 670 km with real consumption | ||
Ford Focus gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Engines | |||
Average engine lifespan: | 580'000 km | 470'000 km | |
Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Skoda Octavia engine could be longer. | |||
Engine production duration: | 4 years | 8 years | |
Engine spread: | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Volkswagen Golf, Volkswagen Bora, Volkswagen Beetle | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Ford Mondeo, Ford C-Max | |
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
Hydraulic tappets: | yes | no | |
The Skoda Octavia engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.51 m | 4.34 m | |
Width: | 1.73 m | 1.84 m | |
Height: | 1.43 m | 1.45 m | |
Skoda Octavia is 17 cm longer than the Ford Focus, 11 cm narrower, while the height of Skoda Octavia is 2 cm lower. | |||
Trunk capacity: | no data | 385 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1247 litres | |
Turning diameter: | 10.8 meters | 10.4 meters | |
The turning circle of the Skoda Octavia is 0.4 metres more than that of the Ford Focus, which means Skoda Octavia can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | no data | 1`775 | |
Safety: | |||
Quality: | above average | below average | |
Skoda Octavia has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Ford Focus has serious deffects in 15 percent more cases than Skoda Octavia, so Skoda Octavia quality is probably better | |||
Average price (€): | 1200 | 1400 | |
Rating in user reviews: | 5.3/10 | 7.8/10 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Skoda Octavia has
|
Ford Focus has
| |