Skoda Octavia 2000 vs Nissan Primera 2003
Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 1.9 Diesel | 2.2 Diesel | |
Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing chain | |
Timing belt usually needs to be replaced more often than the chain, but it is usually significantly cheaper. Timing belt motors are generally quieter and less vibrating than chain motors. | |||
Performance | |||
Power: | 90 HP | 138 HP | |
Torque: | 210 NM | 314 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 13.2 seconds | 10.2 seconds | |
Nissan Primera is a more dynamic driving. Skoda Octavia engine produces 48 HP less power than Nissan Primera, whereas torque is 104 NM less than Nissan Primera. Due to the lower power, Skoda Octavia reaches 100 km/h speed 3 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.0 | 6.1 | |
Real fuel consumption: | 5.4 l/100km | 6.9 l/100km | |
The Skoda Octavia is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Skoda Octavia consumes 1.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Nissan Primera, which means that by driving the Skoda Octavia over 15,000 km in a year you can save 165 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Skoda Octavia consumes 1.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Nissan Primera. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 62 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 1100 km in combined cycle | 1010 km in combined cycle | |
1300 km on highway | 1240 km on highway | ||
1010 km with real consumption | 890 km with real consumption | ||
Skoda Octavia gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Engines | |||
Average engine lifespan: | 610'000 km | 440'000 km | |
Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Skoda Octavia engine could be longer. | |||
Engine production duration: | 13 years | 6 years | |
Engine spread: | Installed on at least 8 other car models, including Volkswagen Golf, Audi A3, Volkswagen Bora, Seat Leon | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Nissan X-Trail, Nissan Almera, Nissan Almera Tino | |
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Skoda Octavia might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Hydraulic tappets: | yes | no | |
The Skoda Octavia engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.51 m | 4.57 m | |
Width: | 1.73 m | 1.76 m | |
Height: | 1.43 m | 1.48 m | |
Skoda Octavia is smaller. Skoda Octavia is 6 cm shorter than the Nissan Primera, 3 cm narrower, while the height of Skoda Octavia is 5 cm lower. | |||
Trunk capacity: | no data | 450 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1812 litres | |
Turning diameter: | 10.8 meters | 11 meters | |
The turning circle of the Skoda Octavia is 0.2 metres less than that of the Nissan Primera. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | no data | 1`940 | |
Safety: | |||
Quality: | above average | low | |
Skoda Octavia has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Nissan Primera has serious deffects in 55 percent more cases than Skoda Octavia, so Skoda Octavia quality is probably significantly better | |||
Average price (€): | 1200 | 1400 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Skoda Octavia has
|
Nissan Primera has
| |