Skoda Octavia 2009 vs Mazda 6 2008

 
Skoda Octavia
2009 - 2013
Mazda 6
2008 - 2010
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 2.0 Diesel2.0 Petrol

Performance

Power: 140 HP147 HP
Torque: 320 NM184 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 9.6 seconds10.2 seconds
Skoda Octavia is more dynamic to drive.
Skoda Octavia engine produces 7 HP less power than Mazda 6, but torque is 136 NM more than Mazda 6. Despite less power, Skoda Octavia reaches 100 km/h speed 0.6 seconds faster.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 5.77.1
Real fuel consumption: 5.9 l/100km8.1 l/100km
The Skoda Octavia is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
By specification Skoda Octavia consumes 1.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mazda 6, which means that by driving the Skoda Octavia over 15,000 km in a year you can save 210 litres of fuel.
By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Skoda Octavia consumes 2.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mazda 6.
Fuel tank capacity: 55 litres64 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 960 km in combined cycle900 km in combined cycle
1140 km on highway1160 km on highway
930 km with real consumption790 km with real consumption

Dimensions

Length: 4.57 m4.76 m
Width: 1.77 m1.80 m
Height: 1.44 m1.44 m
Skoda Octavia is smaller.
Skoda Octavia is 19 cm shorter than the Mazda 6, 3 cm narrower the height of the cars does not differ significantly.
Trunk capacity: 560 litres510 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
1350 litres1702 litres
Even though the car is shorter, Skoda Octavia has 50 litres more trunk space than the Mazda 6. The Mazda 6 may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Mazda 6 (by 352 litres).
Turning diameter: 10.2 meters11.4 meters
The turning circle of the Skoda Octavia is 1.2 metres less than that of the Mazda 6, which means Skoda Octavia can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): 1`9951`950
Safety: no data
Quality:
average

above average
Mazda 6 has slightly fewer faults.
Deffect rate in annual technical inspection is similar for both cars, it's slightly higher for Skoda Octavia, so Mazda 6 quality could be a bit better.
Average price (€): 46003200
Pros and Cons: Skoda Octavia has
  • more dynamic
  • lower fuel consumption
  • roomier boot
  • better manoeuvrability
Mazda 6 has
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • lower price
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv