Skoda Octavia 2009 vs Audi A5 2009
| Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 3.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 140 HP | 240 HP | |
| Torque: | 320 NM | 500 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.6 seconds | 6.1 seconds | |
|
Audi A5 is a more dynamic driving. Skoda Octavia engine produces 100 HP less power than Audi A5, whereas torque is 180 NM less than Audi A5. Due to the lower power, Skoda Octavia reaches 100 km/h speed 3.5 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.7 | 6.6 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 5.9 l/100km | 8.4 l/100km | |
|
The Skoda Octavia is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Skoda Octavia consumes 0.9 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Audi A5, which means that by driving the Skoda Octavia over 15,000 km in a year you can save 135 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Skoda Octavia consumes 2.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Audi A5. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 64 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 960 km in combined cycle | 960 km in combined cycle | |
| 1140 km on highway | 1120 km on highway | ||
| 930 km with real consumption | 760 km with real consumption | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Audi A5 2009 3.0 engine: The Audi 3.0 TDI CCWA is a powerful V6 diesel producing about 240 hp and is generally regarded as a solid and durable engine. With proper maintenance it can cover very high mileage, although over time several typical weak points tend to ... More about Audi A5 2009 3.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.57 m | 4.71 m | |
| Width: | 1.77 m | 1.85 m | |
| Height: | 1.44 m | 1.39 m | |
|
Skoda Octavia is smaller, but higher. Skoda Octavia is 14 cm shorter than the Audi A5, 8 cm narrower, while the height of Skoda Octavia is 5 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 560 litres | 480 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1350 litres | 980 litres | |
|
Skoda Octavia has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, The Audi A5 may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Skoda Octavia (by 370 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.2 meters | 11.5 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Skoda Octavia is 1.3 metres less than that of the Audi A5, which means Skoda Octavia can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Power steering: | Electric power steering | Hydraulic power steering | |
| Electric power steering is simpler, quieter, more fuel-efficient, more configurable and provides additional features such as auto-steering for lane assist and parking. The disadvantages of electric power steering are possible overheating under prolonged load conditions and insufficient feedback (feeling) during steering. | |||
| Gross weight: | 1`995 kg | 2`250 kg | |
| Net weight: | 1`410 kg | 1`720 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 585 kg | 530 kg | |
| Skoda Octavia load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 9 procentiem more than Audi A5. Therefore, Skoda Octavia is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | below average | high | |
| Audi A5 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Skoda Octavia has serious deffects in 45 percent more cases than Audi A5, so Audi A5 quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 3800 | 8000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Skoda Octavia has
|
Audi A5 has
| |