Skoda Octavia 2013 vs Renault Laguna 2013
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 HP | 175 HP | |
| Torque: | 320 NM | 360 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.6 seconds | 10 seconds | |
| Skoda Octavia engine produces 25 HP less power than Renault Laguna, whereas torque is 40 NM less than Renault Laguna. Despite less power, Skoda Octavia reaches 100 km/h speed 1.4 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.5 | 5.7 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.1 l/100km | 7.1 l/100km | |
|
The Skoda Octavia is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Skoda Octavia consumes 1.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Renault Laguna, which means that by driving the Skoda Octavia over 15,000 km in a year you can save 180 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Skoda Octavia consumes 1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Renault Laguna. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 50 litres | 68 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1110 km in combined cycle | 1190 km in combined cycle | |
| 1210 km on highway | 1410 km on highway | ||
| 810 km with real consumption | 950 km with real consumption | ||
| Renault Laguna gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
| Renault Laguna 2013 2.0 engine: The engine has a good power to fuel consumption ratio and, with careful maintenance, a long service life. The most common problems with these engines are with the fuel injection system and lubrication. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.66 m | 4.70 m | |
| Width: | 1.81 m | 1.81 m | |
| Height: | 1.46 m | 1.45 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Skoda Octavia is 4 cm shorter than the Renault Laguna, width is practically the same , while the height of Skoda Octavia is 2 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 590 litres | 450 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1580 litres | no data | |
|
Skoda Octavia has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Skoda Octavia has 140 litres more trunk space than the Renault Laguna. The Renault Laguna may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.1 meters | 11.1 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`900 | 2`076 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | below average | below average | |
| Renault Laguna has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Skoda Octavia has serious deffects in 10 percent more cases than Renault Laguna, so Renault Laguna quality is probably slightly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 8000 | 4600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Skoda Octavia has
|
Renault Laguna has
| |