Skoda Octavia 2013 vs Ford Mondeo 2010
| Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 105 HP | 140 HP | |
| Torque: | 250 NM | 320 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.8 seconds | 10.2 seconds | |
|
Ford Mondeo is a more dynamic driving. Skoda Octavia engine produces 35 HP less power than Ford Mondeo, whereas torque is 70 NM less than Ford Mondeo. Due to the lower power, Skoda Octavia reaches 100 km/h speed 0.6 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 3.8 | 5.6 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 5.3 l/100km | 6.8 l/100km | |
|
The Skoda Octavia is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Skoda Octavia consumes 1.8 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Ford Mondeo, which means that by driving the Skoda Octavia over 15,000 km in a year you can save 270 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Skoda Octavia consumes 1.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Ford Mondeo. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 50 litres | 70 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1310 km in combined cycle | 1250 km in combined cycle | |
| 1510 km on highway | 1480 km on highway | ||
| 940 km with real consumption | 1020 km with real consumption | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
| Ford Mondeo 2010 2.0 engine: In early production engines, the camshaft timing chain often stretched, requiring timely replacement to avoid potential issues. The fuel system, equipped with piezo injectors, is highly sensitive to fuel ... More about Ford Mondeo 2010 2.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.66 m | 4.78 m | |
| Width: | 1.81 m | 1.89 m | |
| Height: | 1.46 m | 1.50 m | |
|
Skoda Octavia is smaller. Skoda Octavia is 12 cm shorter than the Ford Mondeo, 7 cm narrower, while the height of Skoda Octavia is 4 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 590 litres | 486 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1580 litres | 1390 litres | |
|
Skoda Octavia has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Skoda Octavia has 104 litres more trunk space than the Ford Mondeo. The Ford Mondeo may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Skoda Octavia (by 190 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.1 meters | 11.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Skoda Octavia is 0.3 metres less than that of the Ford Mondeo. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`855 | 2`230 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | above average | low | |
| Skoda Octavia has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Ford Mondeo has serious deffects in 80 percent more cases than Skoda Octavia, so Skoda Octavia quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 7200 | 4000 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 8.5/10 | 9.0/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Skoda Octavia has
|
Ford Mondeo has
| |