Skoda Octavia 2013 vs Kia Stinger 2017
| Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.4 Petrol | 3.3 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 140 HP | 370 HP | |
| Torque: | 250 NM | 510 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.4 seconds | 5.1 seconds | |
|
Kia Stinger is a more dynamic driving. Skoda Octavia engine produces 230 HP less power than Kia Stinger, whereas torque is 260 NM less than Kia Stinger. Due to the lower power, Skoda Octavia reaches 100 km/h speed 3.3 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.3 | 9.9 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.5 l/100km | 12.3 l/100km | |
|
The Skoda Octavia is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Skoda Octavia consumes 4.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Kia Stinger, which means that by driving the Skoda Octavia over 15,000 km in a year you can save 690 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Skoda Octavia consumes 5.8 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Kia Stinger. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 50 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 940 km in combined cycle | 600 km in combined cycle | |
| 1080 km on highway | 760 km on highway | ||
| 760 km with real consumption | 480 km with real consumption | ||
| Skoda Octavia gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | |
| Front-wheel drive cars (Skoda Octavia) have better traction on slippery roads and when climbing hills, better fuel economy, and are less expensive to purchase. On the disadvantage side, FWD cars usually have less towing capacity, poorer acceleration and harder handling. Rear-wheel drive cars (Kia Stinger) have better handling on dry roads, better acceleration, more even weight distribution and more fun to drive. RWD is also better for towing large loads. The cons of rear-wheel drive are less interior and trunk space and more difficulty maneuvering in wet and snowy conditions. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.66 m | 4.83 m | |
| Width: | 1.81 m | 1.87 m | |
| Height: | 1.46 m | 1.40 m | |
|
Skoda Octavia is smaller, but higher. Skoda Octavia is 17 cm shorter than the Kia Stinger, 6 cm narrower, while the height of Skoda Octavia is 6 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 590 litres | 406 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1580 litres | 1114 litres | |
|
Skoda Octavia has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Skoda Octavia has 184 litres more trunk space than the Kia Stinger. The Kia Stinger may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Skoda Octavia (by 466 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.1 meters | 11.2 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Skoda Octavia is 0.1 metres less than that of the Kia Stinger. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`805 | 2`260 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Skoda Octavia is better rated in child safety tests. The Kia Stinger scores significantly higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | below average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 8000 | 21 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Skoda Octavia has
|
Kia Stinger has
| |