Skoda Octavia 2017 vs Mazda 3 2019
Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 1.6 Diesel | 1.5 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 116 HP | 120 HP | |
Torque: | 250 NM | 150 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.2 seconds | 12.4 seconds | |
Skoda Octavia is more dynamic to drive. Skoda Octavia engine produces 4 HP less power than Mazda 3, but torque is 100 NM more than Mazda 3. Despite less power, Skoda Octavia reaches 100 km/h speed 2.2 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 3.9 | 6.0 | |
The Skoda Octavia is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Skoda Octavia consumes 2.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mazda 3, which means that by driving the Skoda Octavia over 15,000 km in a year you can save 315 litres of fuel. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 50 litres | 51 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 1280 km in combined cycle | 850 km in combined cycle | |
1310 km on highway | 1010 km on highway | ||
Skoda Octavia gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.67 m | 4.46 m | |
Width: | 1.81 m | 1.80 m | |
Height: | 1.46 m | 1.44 m | |
Skoda Octavia is larger. Skoda Octavia is 21 cm longer than the Mazda 3, 2 cm wider, while the height of Skoda Octavia is 2 cm higher. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 590 litres | 295 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1580 litres | 1019 litres | |
Skoda Octavia has more luggage capacity. Skoda Octavia has 295 litres more trunk space than the Mazda 3. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Skoda Octavia (by 561 litres). | |||
Turning diameter: | 10.5 meters | 10.6 meters | |
The turning circle of the Skoda Octavia is 0.1 metres less than that of the Mazda 3. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 1`870 | no data | |
Safety: | no data | ||
Quality: | below average | low | |
Average price (€): | 11 000 | 21 400 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Skoda Octavia has
|
| |