Skoda Octavia 1996 vs Skoda Octavia 2000
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.9 Diesel | 1.9 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 90 HP | 90 HP | |
| Torque: | 210 NM | 210 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 15 seconds | 15 seconds | |
| Skoda Octavia 1996 and Skoda Octavia 2000 have the same engine power, the torque is the same for both cars. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.3 | 6.3 | |
|
The Skoda Octavia 1996 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Skoda Octavia 1996 consumes 1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Skoda Octavia 2000, which means that by driving the Skoda Octavia 1996 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 150 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 55 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1030 km in combined cycle | 870 km in combined cycle | |
| 1140 km on highway | 1140 km on highway | ||
| Skoda Octavia 1996 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 610'000 km | 610'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 13 years | 13 years | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.51 m | 4.51 m | |
| Width: | 1.73 m | 1.73 m | |
| Height: | 1.43 m | 1.43 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Skoda Octavia 1996 and Skoda Octavia 2000 are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 528 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1330 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.8 meters | 10.8 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`830 | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | above average | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 1000 | 1200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Skoda Octavia has
|
| |