Skoda Octavia 2017 vs Hyundai i30 2017
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 1.6 Diesel | |
| Petrol engines (Skoda Octavia) are generally quieter, smoother, and better suited for short trips due to quicker warm-up times. Diesel (Hyundai i30) engines, on the other hand, offer superior fuel efficiency and torque, making them ideal for long-distance driving and heavy loads. Read more: Petrol vs. Diesel: Fuel Economy and Key Differences. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 230 HP | 136 HP | |
| Torque: | 350 NM | 300 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7 seconds | 10.9 seconds | |
|
Skoda Octavia is more dynamic to drive. Skoda Octavia engine produces 94 HP more power than Hyundai i30, whereas torque is 50 NM more than Hyundai i30. Thanks to more power Skoda Octavia reaches 100 km/h speed 3.9 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.6 | 4.3 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 8.3 l/100km | 5.9 l/100km | |
|
The Hyundai i30 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Skoda Octavia consumes 2.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Hyundai i30, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Skoda Octavia could require 345 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Skoda Octavia consumes 2.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Hyundai i30. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 50 litres | 50 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 750 km in combined cycle | 1160 km in combined cycle | |
| 900 km on highway | 1210 km on highway | ||
| 600 km with real consumption | 840 km with real consumption | ||
| Hyundai i30 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
| Ground clearance: | 141 mm (5.6 inches) | 140 mm (5.5 inches) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.69 m | 4.59 m | |
| Width: | 1.81 m | 1.80 m | |
| Height: | 1.47 m | 1.47 m | |
|
Skoda Octavia is larger. Skoda Octavia is 10 cm longer than the Hyundai i30, 2 cm wider the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 588 litres | 602 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1740 litres | 1650 litres | |
| Despite its longer length, This could mean that the Skoda Octavia uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Skoda Octavia (by 90 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight: | 1`953 kg | 1`940 kg | |
| Net weight: | 1`387 kg | 1`340 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 566 kg | 600 kg | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | below average | high | |
| Hyundai i30 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Skoda Octavia has serious deffects in 155 percent more cases than Hyundai i30, so Hyundai i30 quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 9200 | 12 000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Skoda Octavia has
|
Hyundai i30 has
| |