Skoda Octavia 2017 vs BMW 3 series 2018
Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 1.6 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 116 HP | 150 HP | |
Torque: | 250 NM | 320 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.3 seconds | 8.8 seconds | |
BMW 3 series is a more dynamic driving. Skoda Octavia engine produces 34 HP less power than BMW 3 series, whereas torque is 70 NM less than BMW 3 series. Due to the lower power, Skoda Octavia reaches 100 km/h speed 1.5 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 3.9 | no data | |
Fuel tank capacity: | 50 litres | 40 litres | |
890 km with real consumption | 670 km with real consumption | ||
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | |
BMW 3 sērija 2018 2.0 engine: Pretty reliable engine with great durability. Overall, the chains are more reliable than on BMW N-series engines. However, they do tend to stretch under heavy use. The engine needs good quality fuel, ... More about BMW 3 sērija 2018 2.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.67 m | 4.71 m | |
Width: | 1.81 m | 1.83 m | |
Height: | 1.47 m | 1.44 m | |
Both cars are similar in size. Skoda Octavia is 4 cm shorter than the BMW 3 series, 1 cm narrower, while the height of Skoda Octavia is 3 cm higher. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 610 litres | 500 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1740 litres | 1510 litres | |
Skoda Octavia has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Skoda Octavia has 110 litres more trunk space than the BMW 3 series. The BMW 3 series may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Skoda Octavia (by 230 litres). | |||
Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 11.4 meters | |
The turning circle of the Skoda Octavia is 0.8 metres less than that of the BMW 3 series, which means Skoda Octavia can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 1`912 | 2`180 | |
Safety: | no data | ||
Quality: | below average | below average | |
Skoda Octavia has slightly fewer faults. Deffect rate in annual technical inspection is similar for both cars, it's slightly higher for BMW 3 series, so Skoda Octavia quality could be a bit better. | |||
Average price (€): | 10 200 | 23 200 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Skoda Octavia has
|
BMW 3 sērija has
| |