Skoda Octavia 1998 vs Hyundai Lantra 1995
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
Skoda Octavia is available with front wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive, while Hyundai Lantra can be equipped only with front wheel drive. | |||
Engines: | 1.6 - 2.0 | 1.6 - 2.0 | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 90 - 150 HP | 68 - 139 HP | |
Torque: | 145 - 235 NM | 120 - 182 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.6 - 15.3 seconds | 8.8 - 12.9 seconds | |
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.2 - 9.3 | 6.4 - 9.7 | |
Skoda Octavia petrol engines consumes on average 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than Hyundai Lantra. On average, Skoda Octavia equipped with diesel engines consume 0.9 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Hyundai Lantra. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.51 m | 4.45 m | |
Width: | 1.73 m | 1.70 m | |
Height: | 1.45 m | 1.46 m | |
Both cars are similar in size. Skoda Octavia is 6 cm longer than the Hyundai Lantra, 3 cm wider, while the height of Skoda Octavia is 1 cm lower. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 550 litres | no data | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1512 litres | no data | |
Turning diameter: | 10.8 meters | 10.5 meters | |
The turning circle of the Skoda Octavia is 0.3 metres more than that of the Hyundai Lantra. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`841 | ~ 1`700 | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | above average | below average | |
Average price (€): | 800 | no data | |
Pros and Cons: |
Skoda Octavia has
|
| |