Skoda Octavia 2009 vs Volvo V50 2007
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Engines: | 1.4 - 2.0 | 1.6 - 2.5 | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 80 - 160 HP | 100 - 230 HP | |
Torque: | 132 - 320 NM | 150 - 400 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.9 - 14.3 seconds | 6.9 - 12.1 seconds | |
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.5 - 7.8 | 5.0 - 10.1 | |
Skoda Octavia petrol engines consumes on average 1.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than Volvo V50. On average, Skoda Octavia equipped with diesel engines consume 0.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volvo V50. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.57 m | 4.52 m | |
Width: | 1.79 m | 1.78 m | |
Height: | 1.45 m | 1.46 m | |
Both cars are similar in size. Skoda Octavia is 5 cm longer than the Volvo V50, 1 cm wider, while the height of Skoda Octavia is 1 cm lower. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 606 litres | 417 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1630 litres | no data | |
Skoda Octavia has more luggage capacity. Skoda Octavia has 189 litres more trunk space than the Volvo V50. | |||
Turning diameter: | 10.2 meters | 11.1 meters | |
The turning circle of the Skoda Octavia is 0.9 metres less than that of the Volvo V50, which means Skoda Octavia can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | ~ 2`023 | ~ 1`943 | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | average | average | |
Average price (€): | 4200 | 3200 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Skoda Octavia has
|
Volvo V50 has
| |