Skoda Octavia 2009 vs Skoda Rapid 2012
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.2 - 2.0 | 1.2 - 1.6 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 80 - 200 HP | 75 - 122 HP | |
| Torque: | 132 - 320 NM | 112 - 250 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.2 - 14.2 seconds | 9.5 - 13.9 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.5 - 7.9 | 3.6 - 5.9 | |
|
Skoda Octavia petrol engines consumes on average 1.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than Skoda Rapid. On average, Skoda Octavia equipped with diesel engines consume 1.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Skoda Rapid. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.57 m | 4.48 m | |
| Width: | 1.77 m | 1.71 m | |
| Height: | 1.45 m | 1.46 m | |
|
Skoda Octavia is larger, but slightly lower. Skoda Octavia is 9 cm longer than the Skoda Rapid, 6 cm wider, while the height of Skoda Octavia is 2 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 560 litres | 550 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1350 litres | 1490 litres | |
| Skoda Octavia has 10 litres more trunk space than the Skoda Rapid. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Skoda Rapid (by 140 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.9 meters | 10.9 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`943 | ~ 1`667 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | average | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 4000 | 6200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Skoda Octavia has
|
Skoda Rapid has
| |