Skoda Octavia 2024 vs BMW 3 series 2022
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Skoda Octavia is available with both manual and automatic gearboxes, whereas BMW 3 series is available only with automatic gearbox. | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Rear wheel drive (RWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Skoda Octavia is available with front wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive, while BMW 3 series can be equipped with rear wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive. All-wheel drive models tend to consume more fuel, so if you don't need off road capabilities, Skoda Octavia also offers 2-wheel drive versions for fuel economy. 2WD versions also have lower maintenance costs. | |||
| Engines: | 1.5 - 2.0 (petrol, diesel) | 2.0 - 3.0 (petrol, diesel, hybrid) | |
| Both cars are available with petrol and diesel engines. BMW 3 series is available also with hybrid engines. Hybrid engines offer superior fuel efficiency and reduced emissions compared to conventional engine types. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 115 - 265 HP | 150 - 381 HP | |
| Torque: | 220 - 370 NM | 250 - 700 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 6.5 - 10.7 seconds | 4.5 - 8.8 seconds | |
| In general, BMW 3 series are available with more powerful and dynamic engines than Skoda Octavia. Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.7 - 7.3 | 1.1 - 8.8 | |
|
Skoda Octavia petrol engines consumes on average 1.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than BMW 3 series. On average, Skoda Octavia equipped with diesel engines consume 1.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the BMW 3 series. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
| Ground clearance: | 129 - 142 mm (5.1 - 5.6 inches) | 130 - 141 mm (5.1 - 5.6 inches) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.71 m | 4.71 m | |
| Width: | 1.83 m | 1.83 m | |
| Height: | 1.46 m | 1.43 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Skoda Octavia and BMW 3 series are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 640 litres | 500 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1700 litres | 1510 litres | |
|
Skoda Octavia has more luggage capacity. Skoda Octavia has 140 litres more trunk space than the BMW 3 series. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Skoda Octavia (by 190 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.1 meters | 12 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Skoda Octavia is 0.9 metres less than that of the BMW 3 series, which means Skoda Octavia can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | ~ 1`953 kg | ~ 2`330 kg | |
| Net weight: | ~ 1`437 kg | ~ 1`763 kg | |
| Load capacity: | ~ 516 kg | ~ 567 kg | |
| Skoda Octavia load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 10 procentiem less than BMW 3 series. Therefore, BMW 3 series is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 25 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Skoda Octavia has
|
BMW 3 sērija has
| |