Skoda Octavia 2019 vs Mazda 6 2018
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Body: | Hatchback | Sedan | |
|---|---|---|---|
| The hatchback generally has more luggage space thanks to a larger trunk door opening and the ability to convert the rear of the passenger compartment into luggage space. Sedans tend to be quieter than hatchbacks, due to a more isolated rear area. | |||
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
| Skoda Octavia is available with front wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive, while Mazda 6 can be equipped only with front wheel drive. | |||
| Engines: | 1.0 - 2.0 | 2.0 - 2.5 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 110 - 200 HP | 145 - 250 HP | |
| Torque: | 200 - 360 NM | 213 - 445 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 6.9 - 10.8 seconds | 7.8 - 10.1 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 3.7 - 5.0 | 4.4 - 9.0 | |
|
Skoda Octavia petrol engines consumes on average 2.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than Mazda 6. On average, Skoda Octavia equipped with diesel engines consume 1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mazda 6. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Ground clearance: | 143 mm (5.6 inches) | 165 mm (6.5 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Mazda 6 can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.69 m | 4.88 m | |
| Width: | 1.83 m | 1.84 m | |
| Height: | 1.47 m | 1.45 m | |
|
Skoda Octavia is smaller, but slightly higher. Skoda Octavia is 19 cm shorter than the Mazda 6, 1 cm narrower, while the height of Skoda Octavia is 2 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 600 litres | 489 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1555 litres | no data | |
|
Skoda Octavia has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Skoda Octavia has 111 litres more trunk space than the Mazda 6. The Mazda 6 may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.1 meters | 12 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Skoda Octavia is 0.9 metres less than that of the Mazda 6, which means Skoda Octavia can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`911 | ~ 2`066 | |
| Safety: | |||
| The Skoda Octavia scores higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | no data | low | |
| Average price (€): | 21 600 | 23 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Skoda Octavia has
|
Mazda 6 has
| |