Skoda Octavia 2017 vs Mazda 3 2016

Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison

 
Skoda Octavia
2017 - 2019
Mazda 3
2016 - 2019
Gearbox: Manual/AutomaticManual/Automatic
Wheel drive type: Front wheel drive (FWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)Front wheel drive (FWD)
Skoda Octavia is available with front wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive, while Mazda 3 can be equipped only with front wheel drive.
Engines: 1.0 - 2.01.5 - 2.5

Performance

Power: 110 - 230 HP100 - 184 HP
Torque: 155 - 350 NM150 - 380 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 6.7 - 12 seconds8.1 - 11.9 seconds
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison!

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 3.9 - 6.73.8 - 8.4
Skoda Octavia petrol engines consumes on average 0.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than Mazda 3. On average, Skoda Octavia equipped with diesel engines consume 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mazda 3.
This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version!
Ground clearance: 138 - 141 mm (5.4 - 5.6 inches)155 mm (6.1 inches)
Because of the higher ground clearance, Mazda 3 can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds.

Dimensions

Length: 4.67 m4.47 m
Width: 1.81 m1.80 m
Height: 1.46 m1.45 m
Skoda Octavia is larger.
Skoda Octavia is 20 cm longer than the Mazda 3, 1 cm wider, while the height of Skoda Octavia is 1 cm higher.
Trunk capacity: 590 litres364 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
1580 litres1334 litres
Skoda Octavia has more luggage capacity.
Skoda Octavia has 226 litres more trunk space than the Mazda 3. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Skoda Octavia (by 246 litres).
Turning diameter: 10.5 meters10.6 meters
The turning circle of the Skoda Octavia is 0.1 metres less than that of the Mazda 3.
Gross weight (kg): ~ 1`849~ 1`857
Safety: no datano data
Quality:
below average

average
Average price (€): 11 00010 400
Pros and Cons: Skoda Octavia has
  • available with 4x4 drive
  • lower fuel consumption
  • roomier boot
Mazda 3 has
  • higher ground clearance
  • fewer faults
  • lower price
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv