Skoda Kodiaq 2024 vs Honda CR-V 2022
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.5 Hybrid | 2.0 Hybrid | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 HP | 145 HP | |
| Torque: | 250 NM | 187 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.9 seconds | n/a seconds | |
| Skoda Kodiaq engine produces 5 HP more power than Honda CR-V, whereas torque is 63 NM more than Honda CR-V. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.6 | 5.9 | |
|
The Honda CR-V is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Skoda Kodiaq consumes 0.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Honda CR-V, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Skoda Kodiaq could require 105 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 53 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 830 km in combined cycle | 890 km in combined cycle | |
| Honda CR-V gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.76 m | 4.70 m | |
| Width: | 1.86 m | 1.87 m | |
| Height: | 1.66 m | 1.68 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Skoda Kodiaq is 6 cm longer than the Honda CR-V, width is practically the same , while the height of Skoda Kodiaq is 2 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 845 litres | 1113 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
2035 litres | 2166 litres | |
|
Honda CR-V has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Skoda Kodiaq has 268 litres less trunk space than the Honda CR-V. This could mean that the Skoda Kodiaq uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Honda CR-V (by 131 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | 11.4 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`231 | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | no data | no data | |
| Pros and Cons: |
|
Honda CR-V has
| |