Skoda Kodiaq 2024 vs Skoda Octavia 2013
| Comparing electrical vehicle (EV) with combustion engine (ICE) one is a complex task, but we are doing our best. | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Body: | Crossover / SUV | Estate car / wagon | |
| Crossovers and SUVs have better off-road capabilities (higher ground clearance, can have 4x4 drive), they are preferable for driving on unpaved roads and rural areas. Also, the driver's seating position is higher in a crossover or SUVs, which provides better visibility also in city. This usually comes at the cost of higher fuel consumption, increased weight and higher maintenance costs. | |||
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
| Engine: | 1.5 Hybrid | 1.6 Diesel | |
| Hybrid engines (Skoda Kodiaq) excel in urban environments with superior fuel efficiency and lower emissions during stop-and-go driving. Diesel engines (Skoda Octavia), however, are more fuel-efficient on long highway trips and provide greater torque for towing and heavy loads. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 HP | 105 HP | |
| Torque: | 250 NM | 250 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.9 seconds | 11.1 seconds | |
|
Skoda Kodiaq is more dynamic to drive. Skoda Kodiaq engine produces 45 HP more power than Skoda Octavia, the torque is the same for both cars. Thanks to more power Skoda Kodiaq reaches 100 km/h speed 1.2 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Consumption: | 6.6 l/100km | 4.0 l/100km | |
| Fuel cost per 100km: | no data | 7.20 € | |
|
Change fuel prices per unit to adjust the calculation to the fuel prices in your country. Diesel€/l | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 50 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 830 km in combined cycle | 1250 km in combined cycle | |
| Skoda Octavia gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.76 m | 4.66 m | |
| Width: | 1.86 m | 1.81 m | |
| Height: | 1.66 m | 1.46 m | |
|
Skoda Kodiaq is larger. Skoda Kodiaq is 10 cm longer than the Skoda Octavia, 5 cm wider, while the height of Skoda Kodiaq is 20 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 845 litres | 610 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
2035 litres | 1740 litres | |
|
Skoda Kodiaq has more luggage capacity. Skoda Kodiaq has 235 litres more trunk space than the Skoda Octavia. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Skoda Kodiaq (by 295 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | 11.1 meters | |
| Gross weight: | 2`231 kg | 1`907 kg | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 38 400 | 6600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Skoda Kodiaq has
|
Skoda Octavia has
| |