Skoda Kodiaq 2024 vs Honda CR-V 2022
| Comparing electrical vehicle (EV) with combustion engine (ICE) one is a complex task, but we are doing our best. | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.0 Hybrid | |
| Diesel (Skoda Kodiaq) engines offer better fuel efficiency on highways and deliver high torque, making them ideal for long-distance driving and heavy-duty use. Hybrid (Honda CR-V) engines, however, are more fuel efficient in city traffic and produce lower emissions, especially during low-speed or stop-and-go conditions. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 193 HP | 145 HP | |
| Torque: | 400 NM | 187 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8 seconds | n/a seconds | |
| Skoda Kodiaq engine produces 48 HP more power than Honda CR-V, whereas torque is 213 NM more than Honda CR-V. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Consumption: | 6.6 l/100km | 6.4 l/100km | |
| Fuel cost per 100km: | 14.40 $ | no data | |
|
Change fuel prices per unit to adjust the calculation to the fuel prices in your country. Diesel$/l | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 58 litres | 53 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 870 km in combined cycle | 820 km in combined cycle | |
| Skoda Kodiaq gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.76 m | 4.70 m | |
| Width: | 1.86 m | 1.87 m | |
| Height: | 1.66 m | 1.68 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Skoda Kodiaq is 6 cm longer than the Honda CR-V, width is practically the same , while the height of Skoda Kodiaq is 2 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 845 litres | 1113 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
2035 litres | 2166 litres | |
|
Honda CR-V has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, This could mean that the Skoda Kodiaq uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Honda CR-V (by 131 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | 11.4 meters | |
| Gross weight: | no data | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 39 200 | 42 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Skoda Kodiaq has
|
Honda CR-V has
| |